KOOL-AID IN THE DESERT

27 04 2009

Not too long ago a friend said I had “drunk the kool-aid” by voting for Barack Obama for president. “No way”, I said, “He’s the candidate of The Little Man!”

That’s what my father used to call Democratic politicians. He had been a young man during the Depression, and he had plenty of direct reason to know how much The Little Man needs help under capitalism.

The reason for that need is obvious: Capitalism works by Capital paying for and organizing the work of Labor. The two social classes are symbiotic. But there are very few people around who are wealthy enough to be important capitalists, and there are many millions of laborers. It’s easy for the few capitalists to reach and enforce a consensus among themselves about wages, working conditions, etc., and extremely hard for the millions of working people to do so.

So capitalists have a terrific bargaining advantage when they go looking for labor. They set the terms of employment essentially single-handedly. If you don’t like the pay they’re offering, there’s always another person around the corner who will. And if you turn down x job at pay $y, chances are you won’t find it paying more anywhere else.

In the 1930s unions, aided by a Democratic federal government, balanced the power levels a bit more equally, but that has long gone by the wayside. Republicans have been elected and re-elected, and have indeed gotten “the government off our backs”. So for decades people who are not wealthy have been losing assets and income. The increasing ability of business over the last decade to export jobs to the cheapest possible foreign labor markets has greatly exacerbated this problem.

Against that background I, a lifelong worker, can be excused for hoping that a Democratic president would redress the imbalance. What I forgot was MONEY. With American labor unions moribund, there’s now nowhere for Democratic politicians to get all the money it takes to run for office except from wealthy people — and that is what the Democratic Party has been doing for the last twenty years.

The Little Man, in short, can no longer finance a whole campaign, so now we have government by and for the rich. Sure, Democrats when in power improve things a bit for workers on the margins, but they always know which side their bread is buttered on. This is gradually being made obvious to me by such sources as this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/business/27geithner.html?pagewanted=1&em

and this:

http://miami.indymedia.org/news/2008/05/11008.php

and finally this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/opinion/28herbert.html?_r=1

I thought I’d found the edge of the desert. In fact all I’d found was an Obama oasis.


Actions

Information

2 responses

2 05 2009
MagiMysteryTour

As long you remain friends with Republicans and conservatives you’re going to continue to be put on the defensive in all your conversations. Feeling the need to try to explain things that shouldn’t need explaining. And you’re never going to convince any of them of anything anyhow.

3 05 2009
nightman1

Well, this was anold and valued friend!

Also, I turned the “Kool-Aid” tag from what I think she meant by it to what I mean by it, which is that I have been reminded again that there’s no true Left party in the USA. I distinctly remember reading way back in the Clinton years that the Democratic party had turned from being funded mostly by unions to being funded mostly by liberal rich people. It seems to me that as long as both political parties are funded mostly by rich people, government will never do much for the Little Man in the USA.

The world is divided into 2 groups: Those who have enough money to do nothing if they feel like it, and those who have to work to live–and put up with all the crap that that entails. I don’t think either group can imagine the life of the other, let alone be sympathetic to their problems.

As I walk about the plantation that owns me, watching my fellow lowly servitors scurrying around, pretending to take seriously their little assignments, and har-haring in each other’s faces to lessen the boredom of the endless hours they have to spend there, I wonder how we would look to a wealthy person who could see what each day of our life is spent on.

The first thing that comes to mind is an ant farm I had as a child. It was clear on both sides and you could watch the ants go about their ephemeral insectile work.

Thanks for being an interested reader!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: